Transfer Bar Feeder Automation

High-speed precision transfer system integrated into existing tandem press lines to increase throughput and minimize operator intervention.

Automated Destacker Feeder System
Onatrio Dynamics
A manual transfer process was replaced with a controlled X/Y/Z servo feeder system that moved stamped parts safely between presses without major press modifications.

Key Metrics

Key Area
Outcome
Manual Handling
Removed operator transfer between active presses
Positioning Accuracy
Designed for repeatable motion up to ±0.2 mm
Integration
Installed as a retrofit system with minimal press changes

Quick Overview About The Project:

Client
Confidential automotive manufacturing client.
Industry
Automotive stamping and tandem press line production.
Project Type
Custom transfer bar feeder automation for an existing stamping press line.

Project Summary

The client was running a tandem stamping press line where parts were manually moved from one press to the next.
This created two clear problems. The first was speed. Manual transfer limited how fast the line could run. The second was safety. Operators had to work near active press equipment, which created avoidable risk on the shop floor.

Ontario Dynamics was asked to design a retrofit automation system that could fit into the existing press line. The client did not want to replace the presses. They also did not want a large, expensive automation package that would require major layout changes.

The solution was a compact servo-driven transfer bar feeder. It used a lightweight aluminum transfer bar, quick-release tooling fingers, commercial linear actuators, Mitsubishi servo motors, and a Mitsubishi PLC.

Rectangle 4424

Project Summary

The project needed a transfer system that could automate part movement between presses without disrupting the existing line. The machine had to be strong enough for stamping production, but light enough for fast servo motion. It also had to be easy to maintain, simple for operators to use, and flexible enough for future part changes.
Main Requirements

Automation & Motion

Integration

Operations

Motion Requirements

Area

Function

X-Axis

Moves the transfer bar from one press station to the next

Y-Axis
Moves the tooling in and out of the die area
Z-Axis
Raises and lowers the bar for part pickup and placement

Control Requirements

The feeder had to move in time with the press stroke. To achieve this, Ontario Dynamics added a custom encoder assembly to monitor the press crankshaft position.

This allowed the Mitsubishi PLC to read the press position and command the servo axes at the right moment in the cycle.

The feeder had to enter, pick, retract, transfer, and place the part without interfering with the press motion.
That timing was the heart of the project.

Rectangle 4424 (1)

The Challenge

Main Requirements

The client’s press line depended on manual part transfer between presses.
That slowed production and raised safety concerns. Operators had to move parts near active machines, and the line could only run as fast as the manual transfer process allowed.

The client needed automation, but the existing press line could not be treated like a new installation.
The system had to fit into old equipment, existing space, and current production habits.

Business Impact

Manual transfer affected the line in several ways:
Replacing the presses would have been expensive. A large standard automation package would also entail additional costs, downtime, and integration work.
The client needed a smarter retrofit.
Pain Points
The project had several practical challenges:
Rectangle 4424 (2)

“This was not only a motion-control project. It was a
retrofit engineering challenge where every inch of space
and every control signal mattered.”

ENGINEERING CONCLUSION

The Solution

Ontario Dynamics designed a custom servo-driven transfer bar feeder that served as a compact add-on to the existing press line.
The solution was divided into three main parts: strategy, implementation, and technology.

Strategy

Our approach centre’s on automating existing infrastructure without the need for complete rebuilds. By integrating high-performance, modular components, we deliver immediate throughput improvements with minimal downtime.

Lightweight Structure

Engineered for reduced inertia and higher speed operations.

Off-the-shelf Actuators

Utilizing proven, readily available components for reliability and easy maintenance.

Crank-sync Motion

Precise timing integration with the main press stroke.

Fast Tooling Changes

Tool-less adjustments to minimize changeover times.

Implementation

Lightweight Transfer Bar

The transfer bar was built from high-strength aluminium extrusion profiles.
This reduced the moving mass compared to a heavier welded steel structure. A lighter bar helped the servo axes respond faster and reduced the load on the actuators.
It also made the system easier to adjust for future tooling or part changes.

Three-Axis Servo Motion

The feeder used three coordinated axes.
The X-axis moved the bar between presses.
The Y-axis moved the tooling into and out of the die area.
The Z-axis raised and lowered the bar for pickup and placement.
Each axis used a commercial linear actuator driven by a Mitsubishi servo motor. This gave the system controlled, repeatable movement without the need for complex custom linkages.

Quick-Release Tooling Fingers

Ontario Dynamics added tool-less quick-release mounting for the part-handling fingers.
Operators could remove or adjust tooling fingers using clamp levers instead of screws or special tools.
This sped up changeovers and reduced downtime when the line needed to run different part shapes.

Pneumatic Counterbalance On Z-Axis

The Z-axis had to lift the transfer bar and tooling.
To reduce the load on the vertical servo actuator, Ontario Dynamics added pneumatic counterbalance cylinders. These cylinders supported much of the static weight.
This allowed the Z-axis servo to focus on motion rather than fighting gravity throughout the full cycle.
The result was a more responsive lift motion, better actuator sizing, and lower energy use.

Technology

Mitsubishi PLC And Servo Control

A Mitsubishi PLC controlled the feeder with Mitsubishi servo drives.
The PLC handled the motion sequence, timing, acceleration, deceleration, axis coordination, and position feedback.
The system also included a Mitsubishi HMI that allowed operators to view status, adjust parameters, and troubleshoot alarms.

WordsCharactersReading time

Press Encoder Integration

WordsCharactersReading time

A custom encoder assembly was added to read the crankshaft position of the mechanical press.
This signal allowed the feeder to move in time with the press cycle.
The PLC used encoder feedback to determine when to enter the die area, pick the part, retract, and transfer.
This allowed the feeder to work with the existing presses without changing the core press controls.

WordsCharactersReading time
Minimal Press Modifications

The system was designed as a bolt-on retrofit.
Custom brackets mounted the actuator assemblies using existing press locations where possible. Wiring was routed cleanly, so it did not interfere with other equipment.
Aside from the encoder addition and control integration, the press mechanisms remained largely unchanged.
This helped reduce installation time and minimise downtime.

The Solution

Clear Outcomes

Area

Function
Safety

Removed the need for operators to transfer parts between active presses

Production Flow
Created a more consistent press-to-press transfer cycle
Cycle Time
Reduced idle time between stamping operations
Accuracy
Delivered repeatable servo-controlled positioning
Retrofit Fit
Worked with existing presses without major mechanical changes
Maintenance
Used standard components for easier service and spare parts
Changeover
Quick-release tooling fingers helped reduce setup time
Clear Outcomes
Before
After

Operators manually moved parts between presses

Servo-driven feeder transferred parts automatically

Production speed depended on manual timing
Motion was synchronized with press cycle timing
Staff worked near active press equipment
Manual handling between presses was removed

Part movement could vary between operators

Transfer motion became repeatable and controlled
Changeovers took longer due to tooling adjustment
Quick-release fingers made setup easier
Large retrofit options were costly and disruptive
Compact system fit into the existing press line

Most Important Result

The client received a practical retrofit automation system without replacing the presses.
That was the main win.
Ontario Dynamics did not overbuild the system. The final design used the right level of automation for the job: servo control, press synchronisation, lightweight structure, quick-change tooling, and a compact mechanical layout.

Rectangle 4425
Rectangle 4426
Rectangle 4427

Client Impact

The project changed how the press line operated day to day. Operators no longer had to stand between presses to move parts. The line had a cleaner transfer sequence. The presses could run with less waiting between operations.
The system also gave the maintenance team a machine they could understand and service. It used familiar industrial components, a Mitsubishi control platform, and a clear HMI.
For the client, this meant safer production, better flow, faster changeovers, and lower retrofit cost compared with heavier automation options.

WordsCharactersReading time

Key Takeaways

Safer Press Line Operation

The biggest improvement was removing the manual part transfer between active presses. This reduced direct operator exposure in a high-risk area.

Better Cycle Consistency

The transfer bar feeder moved in sync with the press cycle. This helped reduce timing variation and idle time between operations.

Compact Retrofit Design

The system was built to fit into the existing line. It did not require press replacement or major changes to the press frame.

Faster Tooling Changes

The quick-release finger system made it easier to adjust the feeder for different parts and die setups.

Practical Component Choices

Ontario Dynamics used off-the-shelf actuators, Mitsubishi servo motors, a Mitsubishi PLC, and standard mechanical components. This helped control costs and made long-term maintenance easier.

Lower-Cost Automation

The client needed a reliable transfer feeder, not a full new press automation line. Ontario Dynamics designed the right-sized system for that need.

Need To Automate An Existing Press Line?

Ontario Dynamics designs custom transfer feeders, press line automation systems, and retrofit automation solutions for manufacturers seeking safer, more efficient production.
Speak with our engineering team about your stamping line, transfer bar feeder, servo automation, or custom machine project.